Export limit exceeded: 362544 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 20982 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (20982 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-53214 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-01-14 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix to avoid potential memory corruption in __update_iostat_latency() Add iotype sanity check to avoid potential memory corruption. This is to fix the compile error below: fs/f2fs/iostat.c:231 __update_iostat_latency() error: buffer overflow 'io_lat->peak_lat[type]' 3 <= 3 vim +228 fs/f2fs/iostat.c 211 static inline void __update_iostat_latency(struct bio_iostat_ctx *iostat_ctx, 212 enum iostat_lat_type type) 213 { 214 unsigned long ts_diff; 215 unsigned int page_type = iostat_ctx->type; 216 struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = iostat_ctx->sbi; 217 struct iostat_lat_info *io_lat = sbi->iostat_io_lat; 218 unsigned long flags; 219 220 if (!sbi->iostat_enable) 221 return; 222 223 ts_diff = jiffies - iostat_ctx->submit_ts; 224 if (page_type >= META_FLUSH) ^^^^^^^^^^ 225 page_type = META; 226 227 spin_lock_irqsave(&sbi->iostat_lat_lock, flags); @228 io_lat->sum_lat[type][page_type] += ts_diff; ^^^^^^^^^ Mixup between META_FLUSH and NR_PAGE_TYPE leads to memory corruption. | ||||
| CVE-2025-69269 | 3 Broadcom, Linux, Microsoft | 3 Dx Netops Spectrum, Linux Kernel, Windows | 2026-01-14 | 9.8 Critical |
| Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability in Broadcom DX NetOps Spectrum on Windows, Linux allows OS Command Injection.This issue affects DX NetOps Spectrum: 23.3.6 and earlier. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36581 | 1 Dell | 6 Poweredge R6415, Poweredge R6415 Firmware, Poweredge R7415 and 3 more | 2026-01-14 | 3.8 Low |
| Dell PowerEdge Platform version(s) 14G AMD BIOS v1.25.0 and prior, contain(s) an Access of Memory Location After End of Buffer vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information exposure. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66052 | 1 Vivotek | 2 Ip7137, Ip7137 Firmware | 2026-01-14 | 7.2 High |
| Vivotek IP7137 camera with firmware version 0200a is vulnerable to command injection. Parameter "system_ntpIt" used by "/cgi-bin/admin/setparam.cgi" endpoint is not sanitized properly, allowing a user with administrative privileges to perform an attack. Due to CVE-2025-66050, administrative access is not protected by default, The vendor has not replied to the CNA Possibly all firmware versions are affected. Since the product has met End-Of-Life phase, a fix is not expected to be released. | ||||
| CVE-2023-26210 | 1 Fortinet | 3 Fortiadc, Fortiadc Manager, Fortiadcmanager | 2026-01-14 | 7.8 High |
| Multiple improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerabilties [CWE-78] vulnerability in Fortinet allows a local authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary shell code as `root` user via crafted CLI requests. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23109 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortisiem | 2026-01-14 | 9.7 Critical |
| An improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via via crafted API requests. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23108 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortisiem | 2026-01-14 | 9.7 Critical |
| An improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via via crafted API requests. | ||||
| CVE-2024-21756 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortisandbox | 2026-01-14 | 8.6 High |
| A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.3, FortiSandbox 4.2.1 through 4.2.6, FortiSandbox 4.0.0 through 4.0.4 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted requests.. | ||||
| CVE-2024-21755 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortisandbox | 2026-01-14 | 8.6 High |
| A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.3, FortiSandbox 4.2.1 through 4.2.6, FortiSandbox 4.0.0 through 4.0.4 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted requests.. | ||||
| CVE-2023-47540 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortisandbox | 2026-01-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| An improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.2, FortiSandbox 4.2.1 through 4.2.6, FortiSandbox 4.0 all versions, FortiSandbox 3.2 all versions, FortiSandbox 3.0.5 through 3.0.7 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via CLI. | ||||
| CVE-2023-34992 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortisiem | 2026-01-14 | 9.7 Critical |
| A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted API requests. | ||||
| CVE-2025-47761 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Forticlient, Forticlientwindows | 2026-01-14 | 7.1 High |
| An Exposed IOCTL with Insufficient Access Control vulnerability [CWE-782] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientWindows 7.4.0 through 7.4.3, FortiClientWindows 7.2.0 through 7.2.9 may allow an authenticated local user to execute unauthorized code via fortips driver. Success of the attack would require bypassing the Windows memory protections such as Heap integrity and HSP. In addition, it requires a valid and running VPN IPSec connection. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64153 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortiextender, Fortiextender Firmware | 2026-01-14 | 6.7 Medium |
| A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') in Fortinet FortiExtender 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiExtender 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiExtender 7.2 all versions, FortiExtender 7.0 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via a specific HTTP request. | ||||
| CVE-2022-37969 | 1 Microsoft | 22 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 19 more | 2026-01-13 | 7.8 High |
| Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-14936 | 2 Nsf Unidata, Unidata | 2 Netcdf-c, Netcdf | 2026-01-13 | N/A |
| NSF Unidata NetCDF-C Attribute Name Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of NSF Unidata NetCDF-C. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of attribute names. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current user. Was ZDI-CAN-27269. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14935 | 2 Nsf Unidata, Unidata | 2 Netcdf-c, Netcdf | 2026-01-13 | N/A |
| NSF Unidata NetCDF-C Dimension Name Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of NSF Unidata NetCDF-C. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of dimension names. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length heap-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current user. Was ZDI-CAN-27168. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14934 | 2 Nsf Unidata, Unidata | 2 Netcdf-c, Netcdf | 2026-01-13 | N/A |
| NSF Unidata NetCDF-C Variable Name Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of NSF Unidata NetCDF-C. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of variable names. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current user. Was ZDI-CAN-27267. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14932 | 2 Nsf Unidata, Unidata | 2 Netcdf-c, Netcdf | 2026-01-13 | N/A |
| NSF Unidata NetCDF-C Time Unit Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of NSF Unidata NetCDF-C. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of time units. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current user. Was ZDI-CAN-27273. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62864 | 1 Amperecomputing | 27 Ampereone, Ampereone A128-34x, Ampereone A128-34x Firmware and 24 more | 2026-01-13 | 9.8 Critical |
| Ampere AmpereOne AC03 devices before 3.5.9.3, AmpereOne AC04 devices before 4.4.5.2, and AmpereOne M devices before 5.4.5.1 allow an incorrectly formed SMC call to UEFI-MM MMCommunicate service that could result in an out-of-bounds write within the UEFI-MM Secure Partition context. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62863 | 1 Amperecomputing | 27 Ampereone, Ampereone A128-34x, Ampereone A128-34x Firmware and 24 more | 2026-01-13 | 9.8 Critical |
| Ampere AmpereOne AC03 devices before 3.5.9.3, AmpereOne AC04 devices before 4.4.5.2, and AmpereOne M devices before 5.4.5.1 allow an incorrectly formed SMC call to UEFI-MM PCIe driver that could result in an out-of-bounds write within PCIe driver’s S-EL0 address space. | ||||