Export limit exceeded: 363303 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 363303 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (363303 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-55113 | 2026-07-04 | 7.5 High | ||
| A malicious actor with access to the network could exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability found in UniFi Talk Application to execute a Denial of Service (DoS) attack and bypass authentication in certain UniFi Talk API endpoints. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55117 | 2026-07-04 | 8.6 High | ||
| A malicious actor with access to the network could exploit a Path Traversal vulnerability found in UniFi Access Application to access files on the host device. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55118 | 1 Ubiquiti | 1 Unifi Network Application | 2026-07-04 | 8.3 High |
| A malicious actor with access to the network,low privileges and under certain conditions could exploit an Improper Access Control vulnerability found in UniFi Network Application to escalate privileges within the UniFi Network Application. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55115 | 2026-07-04 | 9.9 Critical | ||
| A malicious actor with access to the network and low privileges could exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in UniFi Protect Application to escalate privileges on the host device. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55116 | 2026-07-04 | 9 Critical | ||
| A malicious actor with access to the network and under certain network configurations could exploit an Improper Access Control vulnerability found in certain devices running UniFi OS to make unauthorized changes to such UniFi OS devices. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55119 | 2026-07-04 | 8.1 High | ||
| A malicious actor with access to the network and low privileges could exploit an Improper Access Control vulnerability found in UniFi Talk Application to escalate privileges within the UniFi Talk Application. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14623 | 1 Omec-project | 1 Amf | 2026-07-04 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was determined in omec-project amf up to 2.1.1. This issue affects the function RRCInactiveTransitionReport of the component NGAP Message Handler. Executing a manipulation can lead to denial of service. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. This patch is called 34bc6724acc97dba1f8691e586da95b042cb612d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11352 | 1 Curl | 1 Curl | 2026-07-04 | N/A |
| An issue in curl’s QUIC UDP receive function allows a malicious HTTP/3 server to trigger a remote denial of service against a curl or libcurl client. Because the helper function discards zero-length UDP datagrams before counting them toward the per-call packet budget, a connected QUIC peer can continuously stream empty datagrams to indefinitely stall the client. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11586 | 1 Curl | 1 Curl | 2026-07-04 | N/A |
| By default, curl automatically responds to WebSocket PING frames. Because curl lacks an upper bound on memory allocation for unacknowledged frames, a malicious server can exhaust all available memory by flooding curl with rapid, sequential PING messages. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11856 | 1 Curl | 1 Curl | 2026-07-04 | N/A |
| Successfully using libcurl to do a transfer to a specific HTTP origin (`hostA`) with **Digest** authentication and then changing the origin to a different one (`hostB`) for a second transfer, reusing the same handle, makes libcurl wrongly pass on the `Authorization:` header field meant for `hostA`, to `hostB`. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12064 | 1 Curl | 1 Curl | 2026-07-04 | N/A |
| When a user invokes curl using a schemeless URL combined with `--proto-default` sftp (or scp), a disconnect occurs between the tool layer and libcurl. The tool layer incorrectly infers the URL scheme, which erroneously bypasses the initialization of critical SSH security options like CURLOPT_SSH_HOST_PUBLIC_KEY_SHA256 and CURLOPT_SSH_KNOWNHOSTS. Conversely, the libcurl runtime successfully honors CURLOPT_DEFAULT_PROTOCOL and establishes the connection via SFTP/SCP as specified. Because the tool layer skipped the security configuration, these SSH host verification options are silently omitted, causing curl to connect to an unverified SSH remote host without throwing an error. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8458 | 1 Curl | 1 Curl | 2026-07-04 | N/A |
| libcurl might in some circumstances reuse the wrong connection when asked to do Negotiate-authenticated ones, even when they are set to use different 'services'. libcurl features a pool of recent connections so that subsequent requests can reuse an existing connection to avoid overhead. When reusing a connection a range of criteria must be met. Due to a logical error in the code, a request that was issued by an application could wrongfully reuse an existing connection to the same server that was authenticated using different services. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8927 | 1 Curl | 1 Curl | 2026-07-04 | N/A |
| When reusing a libcurl handle for sequential transfers driven by environment-variable proxy configuration, libcurl fails to clear the proxy authentication state between requests. Specifically, if the initial transfer authenticates against `proxyA` using Digest auth, a subsequent transfer routed through `proxyB` erroneously leaks the `Proxy-Authorization:` header intended solely for `proxyA`. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9546 | 1 Curl | 1 Curl | 2026-07-04 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in libcurl caused the HTTP `Referer:` header to persist even when explicitly cleared. While the documentation states that passing NULL to `CURLOPT_REFERER` suppresses the header, the option failed to clear the internal state. As a result the previous referrer string was erroneously reused and sent in subsequent requests, potentially leaking sensitive information to unintended servers. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9547 | 1 Curl | 1 Curl | 2026-07-04 | N/A |
| When a libcurl-based application performs transfers via `SCP://` or `SFTP://` and utilizes the `CURLOPT_SSH_KEYFUNCTION` callback, it may silently accept an untrusted server. This vulnerability occurs when a server presents a host key type that does not match the specific key type already recorded for that host in the `known_hosts` file. Instead of rejecting the mismatch, the callback mechanism fails to properly enforce the restriction, allowing the connection to succeed without warning and risking a potential man-in-the-middle attack. | ||||
| CVE-2026-35159 | 2026-07-04 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| Dell Client Platform BIOS contains an Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with physical access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information Disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10054 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Theia | 2026-07-04 | 8.8 High |
| In affected versions of Eclipse Theia (1.8.1 and later), the browser backend exposes privileged terminal RPC over WebSocket (/services/shell-terminal, /services/terminals/:id) without service-level authentication. WebSocket origin validation in @theia/core is fail-open: connections are accepted when the Origin header is missing or when no THEIA_HOSTS allowlist is configured (the default). The Socket.IO integration additionally replaces the real Origin header with a client-supplied fix-origin header that an attacker can control or omit. As a result, a foreign-origin web page visited by a user with a running Theia instance can open the /services WebSocket namespace, invoke terminal creation, attach to the resulting terminal data channel, execute arbitrary OS commands, and read their output. This affects both local developer setups (drive-by attack) and hosted or tunneled deployments without strong external authentication. A fix is in development that enforces same-origin validation by default, removes trust in the fix-origin header, gates HTTP and WebSocket access on a SameSite=Strict; HttpOnly connection-token cookie, and sanitizes shell terminal creation options. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41123 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain | 2026-07-04 | 4.3 Medium |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.6, LTS2026 release version 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.10, LTS2025 release version 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.30, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.70 contain an improper access control vulnerability in the RBAC. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to information tampering. | ||||
| CVE-2026-54483 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain | 2026-07-04 | 6.7 Medium |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.6, LTS2026 release version 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.10, LTS2025 release version 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.30, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.70 contain an improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS command Injection') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Command execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56085 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain | 2026-07-04 | 3.3 Low |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2026 release version 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.10, LTS2025 release version 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.30, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.70 contain an use of uninitialized resource vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to information exposure. | ||||