In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
memcg: keep folio's objcg same as its node
memcg_reparent_objcgs() has an inherent assumption that a folio's objcg is
the objcg of the folio's node. Folio migration across nodes breaks that
assumption: the new folio simply inherits the old folio's objcg while
living on a different node.
Once the assumption is broken, the reparenting of the folio's objcg and
the reparenting of the folio's LRU list are no longer atomic.
memcg_reparent_objcgs() handles one node per iteration and drops all the
locks in between, so the objcg gets reparented in the iteration for the
objcg's node while the LRU list gets spliced in the iteration for the
folio's node. Any LRU operation on that folio in between resolves its
lruvec through the objcg, and thus takes the lru_lock of the wrong memcg,
not the lru_lock of the list the folio is actually on.
Fix this by selecting the objcg by folio_nid() at charge time, and by
re-deriving it for the destination node in mem_cgroup_migrate() and
mem_cgroup_replace_folio().
memcg: keep folio's objcg same as its node
memcg_reparent_objcgs() has an inherent assumption that a folio's objcg is
the objcg of the folio's node. Folio migration across nodes breaks that
assumption: the new folio simply inherits the old folio's objcg while
living on a different node.
Once the assumption is broken, the reparenting of the folio's objcg and
the reparenting of the folio's LRU list are no longer atomic.
memcg_reparent_objcgs() handles one node per iteration and drops all the
locks in between, so the objcg gets reparented in the iteration for the
objcg's node while the LRU list gets spliced in the iteration for the
folio's node. Any LRU operation on that folio in between resolves its
lruvec through the objcg, and thus takes the lru_lock of the wrong memcg,
not the lru_lock of the list the folio is actually on.
Fix this by selecting the objcg by folio_nid() at charge time, and by
re-deriving it for the destination node in mem_cgroup_migrate() and
mem_cgroup_replace_folio().
Default status is the baseline for the product, each version can override it (e.g. patched versions marked unaffected).
| Vendor | Product | Default status | Versions | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | unaffected |
|
|||||||||||||||
| Linux | Linux | affected |
|
No data.
No data.
No data.
Advisories
No advisories yet.
Fixes
Solution
No solution given by the vendor.
Workaround
No workaround given by the vendor.
References
History
Wed, 16 Sep 2026 10:45:00 +0000
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Description | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: memcg: keep folio's objcg same as its node memcg_reparent_objcgs() has an inherent assumption that a folio's objcg is the objcg of the folio's node. Folio migration across nodes breaks that assumption: the new folio simply inherits the old folio's objcg while living on a different node. Once the assumption is broken, the reparenting of the folio's objcg and the reparenting of the folio's LRU list are no longer atomic. memcg_reparent_objcgs() handles one node per iteration and drops all the locks in between, so the objcg gets reparented in the iteration for the objcg's node while the LRU list gets spliced in the iteration for the folio's node. Any LRU operation on that folio in between resolves its lruvec through the objcg, and thus takes the lru_lock of the wrong memcg, not the lru_lock of the list the folio is actually on. Fix this by selecting the objcg by folio_nid() at charge time, and by re-deriving it for the destination node in mem_cgroup_migrate() and mem_cgroup_replace_folio(). | |
| Title | memcg: keep folio's objcg same as its node | |
| First Time appeared |
Linux
Linux linux Kernel |
|
| CPEs | cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* | |
| Vendors & Products |
Linux
Linux linux Kernel |
|
| References |
|
Projects
Sign in to view the affected projects.
MITRE
Status: PUBLISHED
Assigner: Linux
Published:
Updated: 2026-09-16T10:33:00.848Z
Reserved: 2026-09-11T19:38:34.779Z
Link: CVE-2026-89985
Vulnrichment
No data.
NVD
Status : Received
Published: 2026-09-16T11:17:09.547
Modified: 2026-09-16T11:17:09.547
Link: CVE-2026-89985
Redhat
No data.
OpenCVE Enrichment
No data.
Weaknesses
No weakness.