Search

Use the Query Builder to create your own search query, or check out the documentation to learn the search syntax.

Search Examples

CVEs in KEV CVEs with EPSS >= 80% Crit. Microsoft High Apache SQL Injection (CWE-89) Linux Kernel High (CVSS 3.1) Apache Struts RCE (Remote Code Execution) XSS (CWE-79) Critical (CVSS 4.0) CVEs to check

Search Results (3 CVEs found)

Export CSV
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-16443 1 Redhat 8 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Data Grid 8 and 5 more 2026-08-07 7.4 High
A flaw was found in the SAML metadata import functionality of the keycloak-services component, which is the core engine for identity brokering in Red Hat Build of Keycloak. When importing identity provider metadata that lacks specific usage attributes for keys, the system incorrectly disables signature validation for SAML responses even if a signing certificate is provided. This issue allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge a SAML response and gain unauthorized access to a user account by knowing their external identifier.
CVE-2026-15573 1 Redhat 8 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Data Grid 8 and 5 more 2026-08-07 8.1 High
A flaw was found in Keycloak's Authorization Services. The component responsible for matching request paths to security policies (PathMatcher) does not properly normalize URIs before comparison. By adding extra characters like a trailing slash or matrix parameters to a URL, an attacker can trick the system into applying a less restrictive security policy than intended. This allows an authenticated user to access administrative or restricted areas they should not have permission to see.
CVE-2026-18573 1 Redhat 8 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Data Grid 8 and 5 more 2026-08-03 6.5 Medium
A flaw was found in the keycloak-services component of Keycloak, which is used for managing authentication and authorization flows. The issue occurs when a realm administrator configures client policies to enforce specific authentication requirements on confidential clients. Due to improper evaluation of the client state during an update operation, an attacker with client management permissions can bypass these security policies by first creating a public client and then updating it to a confidential client with weaker authentication. This can result in the persistence of clients that do not comply with the intended security hardening of the realm.