Export limit exceeded: 359583 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 359583 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10537 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-30085 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Remote code execution vulnerability in RSForm!pro component 3.0.0 - 3.3.14 for Joomla was discovered. The issue occurs within the submission export feature and requires administrative access to the export feature. | ||||
| CVE-2020-37012 | 1 Ammarfaizi2 | 1 Tea Latex | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| Tea LaTex 1.0 contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands through the /api.php endpoint. Attackers can craft a malicious LaTeX payload with shell commands that are executed when processed by the application's tex2png API action. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34452 | 1 Streama Project | 1 Streama | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Streama versions 1.10.0 through 1.10.5 and prior to commit b7c8767 contain a combination of path traversal and server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities in that allow an authenticated attacker to write arbitrary files to the server filesystem. The issue exists in the subtitle download functionality, where user-controlled parameters are used to fetch remote content and construct file paths without proper validation. By supplying a crafted subtitle download URL and a path traversal sequence in the file name, an attacker can write files to arbitrary locations on the server, potentially leading to remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53561 | 2026-04-15 | 8.7 High | ||
| A remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in Arcadyan Meteor 2 CPE FG360 Firmware ETV2.10 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted request. | ||||
| CVE-2009-20009 | 1 Belkin | 1 Bulldog Plus | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Belkin Bulldog Plus version 4.0.2 build 1219 contains a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in its web service authentication handler. When a specially crafted HTTP request is sent with an oversized Authorization header, the application fails to properly validate the input length before copying it into a fixed-size buffer, resulting in memory corruption and potential remote code execution. Exploitation requires network access and does not require prior authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13699 | 1 Mariadb | 1 Mariadb | 2026-04-15 | 7.0 High |
| MariaDB mariadb-dump Utility Directory Traversal Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of MariaDB. Interaction with the mariadb-dump utility is required to exploit this vulnerability but attack vectors may vary depending on the implementation. The specific flaw exists within the handling of view names. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied path prior to using it in file operations. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current user. Was ZDI-CAN-27000. | ||||
| CVE-2025-50460 | 1 Modelscope | 1 Ms Swift | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| A remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in the ms-swift project version 3.3.0 due to unsafe deserialization in tests/run.py using yaml.load() from the PyYAML library (versions = 5.3.1). If an attacker can control the content of the YAML configuration file passed to the --run_config parameter, arbitrary code can be executed during deserialization. This can lead to full system compromise. The vulnerability is triggered when a malicious YAML file is loaded, allowing the execution of arbitrary Python commands such as os.system(). It is recommended to upgrade PyYAML to version 5.4 or higher, and to use yaml.safe_load() to mitigate the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4662 | 2 Soflyy, Wordpress | 2 Oxygen, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| The Oxygen Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 4.8.2 via post metadata. This is due to the plugin storing custom data in post metadata without an underscore prefix. This makes it possible for lower privileged users, such as contributors, to inject arbitrary PHP code via the WordPress user interface and gain elevated privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2012-10033 | 1 Angstrom Distribution | 1 Narcissus | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Narcissus is vulnerable to remote code execution via improper input handling in its image configuration workflow. Specifically, the backend.php script fails to sanitize the release parameter before passing it to the configure_image() function. This function invokes PHP’s passthru() with the unsanitized input, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary system commands. Exploitation occurs via a crafted POST request, resulting in command execution under the web server’s context. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5082 | 1 Sonatype | 1 Nexus Repository Manager | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A Remote Code Execution vulnerability has been discovered in Sonatype Nexus Repository 2. This issue affects Nexus Repository 2 OSS/Pro versions up to and including 2.15.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60641 | 1 Vfront | 1 Vfront | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| The file mexcel.php in the Vfront 0.99.52 codebase contains a vulnerable call to unserialize(base64_decode($_POST['mexcel'])), where $_POST['mexcel'] is user-controlled input. This input is decoded from base64 and deserialized without validation or use of the allowed_classes option, allowing an attacker to inject arbitrary PHP objects. This can lead to malicious behavior, such as Remote Code Execution (RCE), SQL Injection, Path Traversal, or Denial of Service, depending on the availability of exploitable classes in the Vfront codebase or its dependencies. | ||||
| CVE-2025-58358 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| Markdownify is a Model Context Protocol server for converting almost anything to Markdown. Versions below 0.0.2 contain a command injection vulnerability, caused by the unsanitized use of input parameters within a call to child_process.exec, enabling an attacker to inject arbitrary system commands. Successful exploitation can lead to remote code execution under the server process's privileges. The server constructs and executes shell commands using unvalidated user input directly within command-line strings. This introduces the possibility of shell metacharacter injection (|, >, &&, etc.). This issue is fixed in version 0.0.2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12488 | 1 Text-generation-webui | 1 Text-generation-webui | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| oobabooga text-generation-webui trust_remote_code Reliance on Untrusted Inputs Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of oobabooga text-generation-webui. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the trust_remote_code parameter provided to the load endpoint. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied argument before using it to load a model. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the service account. . Was ZDI-CAN-26680. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12703 | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High | ||
| CWE-502: Deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability exists that could lead to loss of confidentiality, integrity and potential remote code execution on workstation when a non-admin authenticated user opens a malicious project file. | ||||
| CVE-2022-50909 | 1 Algosolutions | 1 Algo 8028 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| Algo 8028 Control Panel version 3.3.3 contains a command injection vulnerability in the fm-data.lua endpoint that allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands. Attackers can exploit the insecure 'source' parameter by injecting commands that are executed with root privileges, enabling remote code execution through a crafted POST request. | ||||
| CVE-2025-57602 | 1 Aikaan | 1 Iot Management Platform | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| Insufficient hardening of the proxyuser account in the AiKaan IoT management platform, combined with the use of a shared, hardcoded SSH private key, allows remote attackers to authenticate to the cloud controller, gain interactive shell access, and pivot into other connected IoT devices. This can lead to remote code execution, information disclosure, and privilege escalation across customer environments. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7074 | 2026-04-15 | 6.8 Medium | ||
| An arbitrary file upload vulnerability exists in multiple WSO2 products due to improper validation of user input in SOAP admin services. A malicious actor with administrative privileges can upload an arbitrary file to a user-controlled location on the server. By leveraging this vulnerability, an attacker could upload a specially crafted payload, potentially achieving remote code execution (RCE) on the server. Exploitation requires valid admin credentials, limiting its impact to authorized but potentially malicious users. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54317 | 1 Logpoint | 1 Logpoint | 2026-04-15 | 8.4 High |
| An issue was discovered in Logpoint before 7.6.0. An attacker with operator privileges can exploit a path traversal vulnerability when creating a Layout Template, which can lead to remote code execution (RCE). | ||||
| CVE-2023-5395 | 1 Honeywell | 1 Experion Server | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| Server receiving a malformed message that uses the hostname in an internal table may cause a stack overflow resulting in possible remote code execution. See Honeywell Security Notification for recommendations on upgrading and versioning. | ||||
| CVE-2025-44179 | 1 Hitron | 1 Cgnf-twn | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| Hitron CGNF-TWN 3.1.1.43-TWN-pre3 contains a command injection vulnerability in the telnet service. The issue arises due to improper input validation within the telnet command handling mechanism. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by injecting arbitrary commands through the telnet interface when prompted for inputs or commands. Successful exploitation could lead to remote code execution (RCE) under the privileges of the telnet user, potentially allowing unauthorized access to system settings and sensitive information. | ||||