Export limit exceeded: 359337 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (359337 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-54804 | 2026-06-17 | 7.6 High | ||
| Subscriber Broken Authentication in Melhor Envio <= 2.16.3 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-54189 | 2026-06-17 | 7.1 High | ||
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in JetEngine <= 3.8.10 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-54188 | 2026-06-17 | 7.1 High | ||
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in JetEngine <= 3.8.10 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-54185 | 2026-06-17 | 8.5 High | ||
| Subscriber SQL Injection in Cornerstone < 7.8.8 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-52706 | 2026-06-17 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| Unauthenticated PHP Object Injection in JetEngine <= 3.8.10 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-52705 | 2026-06-17 | 9 Critical | ||
| Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Upload in SigmaForms Pro – AI Generated Forms <= 1.4.5 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49778 | 2026-06-17 | 7.1 High | ||
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in WPFunnels Pro <= 2.9.4 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49084 | 2026-06-17 | 9.3 Critical | ||
| Unauthenticated SQL Injection in JetEngine < 3.8.9.1 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49076 | 2026-06-17 | 9.3 Critical | ||
| Unauthenticated SQL Injection in JetEngine <= 3.8.9.1 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49074 | 2026-06-17 | 7.1 High | ||
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in JetEngine <= 3.8.9.1 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49072 | 2026-06-17 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in WooCommerce Anti-Fraud <= 7.2.6 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22340 | 2026-06-17 | 9.3 Critical | ||
| Unauthenticated SQL Injection in WPJobster <= 6.3.5 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22335 | 2026-06-17 | 8.5 High | ||
| Subscriber SQL Injection in WooCommerce Frontend Manager – Ultimate < 6.7.7 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-69148 | 2026-06-17 | 8.1 High | ||
| Unauthenticated Local File Inclusion in Quirky <= 1.23 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-69110 | 2026-06-17 | 8.1 High | ||
| Unauthenticated Local File Inclusion in AirSupply <= 2.0.0 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60205 | 2026-06-17 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| Unauthenticated PHP Object Injection in ThemeREX Addons <= 2.36.1.1 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-58954 | 2026-06-17 | 8.1 High | ||
| Unauthenticated Local File Inclusion in HomeRoofer <= 2.11.0 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2024-52488 | 2026-06-17 | 9.9 Critical | ||
| Subscriber Arbitrary File Upload in Grip <= 1.0.9 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-46173 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-06-17 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: exit: prevent preemption of oopsing TASK_DEAD task When an already-exiting task oopses, make_task_dead() currently calls do_task_dead() with preemption enabled. That is forbidden: do_task_dead() calls __schedule(), which has a comment saying "WARNING: must be called with preemption disabled!". If an oopsing task is preempted in do_task_dead(), between becoming TASK_DEAD and entering the scheduler explicitly, bad things happen: finish_task_switch() assumes that once the scheduler has switched away from a TASK_DEAD task, the task can never run again and its stack is no longer needed; but that assumption apparently doesn't hold if the dead task was preempted (the SM_PREEMPT case). This means that the scheduler ends up repeatedly dropping references on the dead task's stack, which can lead to use-after-free or double-free of the entire task stack; in other words, two tasks can end up running on the same stack, resulting in various kinds of memory corruption. (This does not just affect "recursively oopsing" tasks; it is enough to oops once during task exit, for example in a file_operations::release handler) | ||||
| CVE-2023-40132 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | 7.8 High |
| In setActualDefaultRingtoneUri of RingtoneManager.java, there is a possible way to bypass content providers read permissions due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | ||||