| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Ericsson
Packet Core Gateway (PCG) versions prior to 1.30 contain an Improper Handling
of Missing Values (CWE-230) vulnerability where an attacker continuously
sending a specially crafted message can cause service degradation. The impact continues as long the attack persists but the system recovers from the crashes when the attack stops. |
| Ericsson
Packet Core Gateway (PCG) versions prior to 1.30 contain an Improper Handling
of Missing Values (CWE-230) vulnerability where an attacker continuously
sending a specially crafted message can cause service degradation. The impact continues as long the attack persists but the system recovers from the crashes when the attack stops. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: fix block_group_tree dirty_list corruption
When the incompat flag EXTENT_TREE_V2 is set, we unconditionally add the
block group tree to the switch_commits list before calling
switch_commit_roots, as we do for the tree root and the chunk root.
However, the block group tree uses normal root dirty tracking and in any
transaction that does an allocation and dirties a block group, the block
group root will already be linked to a list by the dirty_list field and
this use of list_add_tail() is invalid and corrupts the prev/next
members of block_group_root->dirty_list.
This is apparent on a subsequent list_del on the prev if we enable
CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST:
[32.1571] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[32.1572] list_del corruption. next->prev should beffff958890202538, but was ffff9588992bd538. (next=ffff958890201538)
[32.1575] WARNING: lib/list_debug.c:65 at 0x0, CPU#3: sync/607
[32.1583] CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 607 Comm: sync Not tainted 6.18.0 #24PREEMPT(none)
[32.1585] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS1.17.0-4.fc41 04/01/2014
[32.1587] RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x108/0x120
[32.1593] RSP: 0018:ffffaa288287fdd0 EFLAGS: 00010202
[32.1594] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff95889326e800 RCX:ffff958890201538
[32.1596] RDX: ffff9588992bd538 RSI: ffff958890202538 RDI:ffffffff82a41e00
[32.1597] RBP: ffff958890202538 R08: ffffffff828fc1e8 R09:00000000ffffefff
[32.1599] R10: ffffffff8288c200 R11: ffffffff828e4200 R12:ffff958890201538
[32.1601] R13: ffff95889326e958 R14: ffff958895c24000 R15:ffff958890202538
[32.1603] FS: 00007f0c28eb5740(0000) GS:ffff958af2bd2000(0000)knlGS:0000000000000000
[32.1605] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[32.1607] CR2: 00007f0c28e8a3cc CR3: 0000000109942005 CR4:0000000000370ef0
[32.1609] Call Trace:
[32.1610] <TASK>
[32.1611] switch_commit_roots+0x82/0x1d0 [btrfs]
[32.1615] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x968/0x1550 [btrfs]
[32.1618] ? btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier+0x23/0x60 [btrfs]
[32.1621] __iterate_supers+0xe8/0x190
[32.1622] ? __pfx_sync_fs_one_sb+0x10/0x10
[32.1623] ksys_sync+0x63/0xb0
[32.1624] __do_sys_sync+0xe/0x20
[32.1625] do_syscall_64+0x73/0x450
[32.1626] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[32.1627] RIP: 0033:0x7f0c28d05d2b
[32.1632] RSP: 002b:00007ffc9d988048 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX:00000000000000a2
[32.1634] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc9d988228 RCX:00007f0c28d05d2b
[32.1636] RDX: 00007f0c28e02301 RSI: 00007ffc9d989b21 RDI:00007f0c28dba90d
[32.1637] RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000001 R09:0000000000000000
[32.1639] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12:000055b96572cb80
[32.1641] R13: 000055b96572b19f R14: 00007f0c28dfa434 R15:000055b96572b034
[32.1643] </TASK>
[32.1644] irq event stamp: 0
[32.1644] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
[32.1646] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff81298817>]copy_process+0xb37/0x2260
[32.1648] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff81298817>]copy_process+0xb37/0x2260
[32.1650] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
[32.1652] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Furthermore, this list corruption eventually (when we happen to add a
new block group) results in getting the switch_commits and
dirty_cowonly_roots lists mixed up and attempting to call update_root
on the tree root which can't be found in the tree root, resulting in a
transaction abort:
[87.8269] BTRFS critical (device nvme1n1): unable to find root key (1 0 0) in tree 1
[87.8272] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[87.8274] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -117)
[87.8275] WARNING: fs/btrfs/root-tree.c:153 at 0x0, CPU#4: sync/703
[87.8285] CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 703 Comm: sync Not tainted 6.18.0 #25 PREEMPT(none)
[87.8287] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.17.0-4.fc41 0
---truncated--- |
| OpenStack Ironic through before 35.0.2 allows file overwrite via directory traversal during deployment with a crafted ISO image. |
| A path traversal vulnerability exists in jupyter-server version 2.17.0 due to an incorrect root directory boundary check in the _get_os_path() function within jupyter_server/services/contents/fileio.py. The check uses startswith(root) without appending a trailing path separator, allowing sibling directories with names starting with the same prefix as root_dir to bypass the check. Additionally, the to_os_path() function in utils.py does not strip ".." from path parts, enabling traversal sequences to bypass the vulnerable check. This vulnerability can lead to unauthorized read/write access to files in sibling directories, potentially exposing sensitive data in shared hosting environments. |
| Nozomi Networks Labs identified a CWE-23: Relative Path Traversal in the Administration WebUI in Waterfall WF-500 TX and RX Hosts in version 7.9.1.0 R2502171040 that allows remote unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary files on the Host machines. |
| Nozomi Networks Labs identified a CWE-23: Relative Path Traversal in the Console WebUI in Waterfall WF-500 TX and RX Hosts in version 7.9.1.0 R2502171040 that allows remote unauthenticated attackers to read arbitrary files from the device. |
| Nozomi Networks Labs identified a CWE-23: Relative Path Traversal (Zip Slip) in Waterfall WF-500 RX Host in version 7.9.1.0 R2502171040 that allows attackers with access to the TX Host to execute code on the RX Host when a MySQL connector is configured and file compression is enabled. |
| Path traversal vulnerability in Remote Spark (https://www.Remotespark.Com/) SparkView allows reading and writing arbitrary files in all directories as root. This leads to RCE. The affected component is the RDP drive redirection. Depending on implementation, the vulnerability can be exploited by an unauthenticated attacker.
This issue affects SparkView: before build 1127. |
| This vulnerability in Veeam Service Provider Console allows for remote code execution. |
| DreamMaker developed by Interinfo has an Arbitrary File Read vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated local attackers to exploit Relative Path Traversal to download arbitrary system files. |
| DreamMaker developed by Interinfo has an Arbitrary File Read vulnerability, allowing privileged local attackers to exploit Relative Path Traversal to download arbitrary system files. |
| Relative Path Traversal vulnerability in Apache Ignite REST API.
Authenticated REST API users can read any file on the server with "cmd=log" command and a log path crafted in a certain way.
This issue affects Apache Ignite: from 2.0.0 through 2.17.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.18.0, which fixes the issue. |
| Detect-It-Easy prior to 3.21 contains a path traversal vulnerability that allows attackers to write arbitrary files to the filesystem by crafting malicious archive entries with relative traversal sequences or absolute paths. Attackers can exploit insufficient path normalization during archive extraction to write files outside the intended extraction directory and achieve persistent code execution by overwriting user startup scripts. |
| A path traversal vulnerability exists in WOSDefaultHttpModule.dll when processing a URL path starting with /woshome |
| Algernon is a small self-contained pure-Go web server. Prior to 1.17.8, when algernon is started with --domain (or --letsencrypt, which silently turns on --domain at engine/flags.go:372), the request handler resolves the served directory by joining the configured --dir with the value of the client-supplied Host header. The join is performed by filepath.Join with no validation, so a Host: .. header walks one level above the document root. Subsequent file resolution then exposes everything in that parent directory — arbitrary file read, full directory listing, and, if any .lua file is present, server-side Lua execution. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.17.8. |
| Concrete CMS 9.5.0 and below fails to sanitize path traversal sequences in the ptComposerFormLayoutSetControlCustomTemplate field when saving page type composer form layouts. An authenticated rogue administrator with composer form editing rights can exploit this to include arbitrary readable files on the server. Combined with the file uploader's extension-only validation (which permits PHP code in files saved with image extensions like .png), this can result in authenticated remote code execution. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 9.4 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H Thanks Yonatan Drori (Tenzai) for reporting. |
| Dify version 1.14.1 and prior contain a path traversal vulnerability that allows authenticated users to manipulate requests forwarded to the Plugin Daemon's internal REST API by exploiting insufficient URL path sanitization. Attackers can traverse out of their authorized tenant path using unencoded dot sequences in task identifiers or manipulated filename parameters to access internal endpoints such as debug interfaces, requiring only knowledge of the victim tenant's UUID. NOTE: Dify Cloud allows unauthenticated free self-registration, making account creation trivially accessible to any attacker. |
| Office for Android Spoofing Vulnerability |
| A directory traversal vulnerability in the Apex One (on-premise) server could allow a pre-authenticated local attacker to modify a key table on the server to inject malicious code to deploy to agents on affected installations.
This vulnerability is only exploitable on the on-premise version of Apex One and a potential attacker must have access to the Apex One Server and already obtained administrative credentials to the server via some other method to exploit this vulnerability. |
